
The 1782 adultery trial of Lady Seymour Worsley
Sir Richard Worsley tried to turn his wife’s "extracurriculars" into a massive payday. He sued her lover for £20,000, treating Seymour like a piece of damaged property he wanted a refund on.
But Seymour had the ultimate receipts. She paraded her lovers into court to prove Richard hadn't just known about the affairs—he’d actually helped her climb through windows to meet them.
The jury was so grossed out by Richard’s voyeurism they awarded him exactly one shilling. Imagine losing your dignity and your money in the same afternoon.
Richard wasn't being a "cool" husband; he was a total creep. He had a major voyeurism kink and got a thrill out of his wife being desired by his own inner circle.
The most scandalous "receipt" was the Maidstone bathhouse incident. Richard literally gave his friend, George Bissett, a leg-up so George could peep at Seymour through a window while she was undressing.
He treated his wife like a gallery exhibit for his buddies. He only sued when Seymour and George actually ran away together, proving he was fine with the "show" but couldn't handle losing his "property."
Richard tried to claim his "assistance" was just a joke, not consent. He wanted the jury to see him as a victim of a stolen "asset," ignoring that he’d literally helped the "thief" peep.
Seymour crushed him by calling witnesses who proved Richard was the director of the whole scene. It’s impossible to play the heartbroken husband when you were the human step-stool for the affair.
The jury’s one-shilling verdict was a legendary burn. They legally agreed the adultery happened but decided Richard's reputation was worth next to nothing. He won the case but became London's biggest laughingstock.
Oh, it was a total social cancellation. Richard was a powerful politician, but after the 'shilling' verdict, he couldn't enter a club without everyone whispering about his 'leg-up' antics.
He eventually fled to the Continent to hide from the mockery. He spent years wandering Europe, basically trying to outrun the 'human step-stool' memes of his day.
Seymour didn't get a fairy tale ending either. As a legal adulteress, she couldn't remarry while Richard lived, but she leaned into her infamy, living a scandalous, independent life that kept the tabloids fed for decades.
Seymour essentially invented the "influencer" pivot. Since Richard refused a divorce out of spite, she found wealthy "benefactors" to fund her high-society habits. She treated her scandal like a brand, staying in the headlines just to keep Richard’s blood pressure high.
The ultimate petty win came when Richard finally died in 1805. Seymour immediately reclaimed her maiden name and her massive fortune. She then married a much younger man, proving that the best revenge is outliving your hater and spending the money he never got.
Related topics
The 1777 'Secret' intervention of Emperor Joseph II at Versailles
The 1725 French court obsession with the 'right to sit on stools'
The 1740s 'Order of the Pug' secret barking rituals
The 1792 'Petticoat Duel' sparked by an insult about aging
The 1745 'politeness' standoff at the Battle of Fontenoy
The 1798 publication of Napoleon’s intercepted letters about Josephine’s affair