SoDeep IconSoDeep
·
The 1745 'politeness' standoff at the Battle of Fontenoy

The 1745 'politeness' standoff at the Battle of Fontenoy

@HistoryTea_spilled · June 23, 2026

Imagine being so obsessed with "main character energy" that you’d rather die than be rude. At the Battle of Fontenoy, British and French guards stood face-to-face, tipping hats and arguing over who should have the honor of shooting first.

It looks like peak petty etiquette, but it was a high-stakes game of chicken. Muskets were so slow to reload that the side firing first became a sitting duck for the next minute.

They were just waiting for the other guy to waste his shot so they could deliver a lethal, point-blank "receipt." It’s the ultimate "no, I insist" with a body count.

Wait, so who finally broke first and fired the first shot?

It was the ultimate 'I’m not touching you' game. Lord Charles Hay of the British Guards literally pulled out a flask, toasted the French, and dared them to fire first. He was basically calling their bluff in front of everyone.

The French commander tried to stay classy and refused, but his guys eventually cracked and let it rip. They fired from too far away, making their 'big moment' a total flop because the bullets barely reached the target.

The British then marched up and delivered a volley that basically deleted the French front line. Talk about a brutal unfollow.

So how close did they actually get before the British finally fired?

We’re talking 'can see the color of their eyes' close. The British marched until they were about 30 paces away—basically the length of a short red carpet. It was the ultimate high-stakes flex of nerves.

At that range, those muskets weren't just messy; they were a total delete button. Because they waited until they were practically breathing on the French, their volley didn't just hit—it absolutely shredded the competition's front row.

It was a total 'hold my drink' moment. By refusing to flinch until they were within spitting distance, the British turned a chaotic scene into a perfectly timed, lethal main-character execution.

What kind of training actually makes a person ignore incoming bullets like that?

It was all about the 'brand.' In the 18th century, a regiment’s reputation was everything. If you ran or even ducked, you were basically 'canceled' by high society. These soldiers were drilled to value their 'main character' image more than their own lives.

They practiced formations until they were basically robots in red coats. To them, flinching was a bigger social faux pas than getting shot.

By walking slowly and silently, they were gaslighting the French into thinking they were invincible. It wasn't just bravery; it was a high-stakes psychological flex.

What happened to the 'flops' who couldn't handle the pressure?

If you flopped, your career was over before the smoke cleared. For an officer, it meant 'selling out'—literally selling his commission at a loss and fleeing the country in shame. His family would treat him like a ghost to protect their own brand.

In the high-society gossip mills of London and Paris, a report of 'cowardice' was the ultimate tea. You’d be barred from the best clubs, ignored by potential brides, and mocked in satirical prints that were the 18th-century version of viral memes.

Even the rank-and-file soldiers had a brutal 'HR policy.' If a man turned tail, his own comrades might beat him or the officers would execute him to keep the 'main character' vibe of the unit intact. There was no room for a supporting actor in a front-row bloodbath.

Explore in card mode →

Related topics

The 1777 'Secret' intervention of Emperor Joseph II at VersaillesThe 1725 French court obsession with the 'right to sit on stools'The 1740s 'Order of the Pug' secret barking ritualsThe 1792 'Petticoat Duel' sparked by an insult about agingThe 1798 publication of Napoleon’s intercepted letters about Josephine’s affairThe 1790s 'coiffure à la victime' and post-guillotine party scene