SoDeep IconSoDeep
·
The 'Broken Window Fallacy' and the myth of job creation

The 'Broken Window Fallacy' and the myth of job creation

@Tradie_Kant_Wait · June 15, 2026

A kid smashes a bakery window and people actually cheer because the glazier just got a job. It looks like 'economic growth' in action, but it’s a total scam called the Broken Window Fallacy.

The baker now has to spend his cash fixing glass instead of buying a new pair of boots. The glazier wins, but the cobbler loses a sale he never knew was coming.

Destruction isn't a stimulus; it's just a shakedown. You aren't 'creating jobs' if you're just forcing someone to pay for something they already owned five minutes ago.

Wait, if the cobbler's loss is invisible, how do we know it's real?

It’s real because the baker’s wallet is lighter. You’ve just swapped a 'want' like new boots for a 'need' like a window repair. That’s a step backward for everyone's standard of living.

Imagine a bucket of water. You scoop a liter out of the deep end and pour it into the shallow end. The shallow end looks fuller, but the total water in the pool hasn't changed.

You probably spilled some while carrying the bucket, too. That's the real cost—the wasted effort of fixing things that weren't broken, leaving the whole neighborhood poorer.

How do we actually see that 'wasted effort' in a real neighborhood?

Think of it as 'treadmill work.' You’re sweating and burning through your lunch, but you haven't moved an inch. In a city, that’s the diesel in the glazier’s ute and the raw materials used for the glass.

If the window hadn't smashed, those materials could've gone into a new house. Instead, they were used up just to make the street look exactly like it did yesterday morning.

That’s the 'spill.' It’s the literal burning of resources just to stand still. You’re keeping people busy, but the neighborhood is down one window’s worth of wealth.

Isn't keeping people busy exactly what creates a strong, circulating economy though?

Movement isn't the same as progress. If I pay you fifty bucks to dig a hole and then another fifty to fill it back up, money 'circulated,' sure. But at the end of the day, we’re both sweaty, I’m out a hundred bucks, and we still have the exact same flat patch of dirt.

A healthy economy isn't just about cash changing hands; it's about what that cash leaves behind. Real wealth is the stuff we actually use—the boots, the bread, the new house.

When you're just 'busy' fixing broken glass, you're running at full tilt just to stay in the same spot. You're circulating currency, but you're suffocating prosperity.

So the glazier is just supposed to go hungry for the sake of 'prosperity'?

Not at all. The glazier is a skilled legend with a van full of tools. The tragedy isn't that he's working; it's that his talent is being wasted on a 'reset' button.

If the window stays intact, he doesn't just vanish. He goes and builds a glass conservatory or installs a skylight. Now, the neighborhood has the original window plus a fancy new upgrade.

That’s the secret. One scenario leaves us with a repaired hole; the other leaves us with the hole and something new. We want him adding to the pile, not just treading water.

Explore in card mode →

Related topics

The 'Lump of Labour' fallacy and the fear of site automationThe 'Tragedy of the Commons' and why shared lunchrooms are filthyThe 'Cost Disease' and why your haircut keeps getting pricierPrice discrimination and why stadium beer is so expensiveThe 'Winner's Curse' in competitive construction biddingThe 'Free-Rider Problem' and why some blokes skip their shout