SoDeep IconSoDeep
·
The 1970 Irish bank strike and pub-check economy

The 1970 Irish bank strike and pub-check economy

@Dr. Arthur Grift · June 25, 2026

In 1970, Ireland’s banks shut down for six months. You’d expect a total collapse, but the Irish just moved their entire financial system to the local pub.

Bartenders became the new central bankers. Because they knew exactly who was a deadbeat and who was good for a pint, they cashed checks and traded IOUs over the bar. It was a massive, decentralized credit system fueled by social pressure and stout.

When the real banks finally reopened, they found a perfectly functioning economy managed by guys in aprons who didn't need a single spreadsheet to keep the country afloat.

Wait, what happened if someone actually tried to pass a bad check?

You didn't just lose money; you lost your dignity. In a tight-knit Irish community, being blacklisted by the local publican was a fate far worse than a modern bankruptcy filing.

The bartender was a walking credit-rating agency. If you tried to scam the system, word traveled faster than a spilled drink. You’d be cut off from the only bank in town immediately.

This was the shame economy. The threat of being barred for life kept everyone honest, making a pub's ledger more reliable than many Wall Street spreadsheets.

So did the banks actually honor those beer-stained checks when they reopened?

They had no choice. When the strike ended, the banks were buried under a mountain of paper that had been circulating like actual cash for months. It was a giant game of financial catch-up.

Surprisingly, the unprofessional pub system was incredibly accurate. The default rate was lower than what the banks usually saw. A bartender’s intuition proved more effective than any modern credit score.

It took months to process, but the banks eventually cleared almost everything. They realized that while they were away, the pubs had kept the heart of the economy beating with nothing but ink and social pressure.

How did people get change back if they only had one large check?

It was a game of high-stakes origami. If you had a £10 check but only wanted a 2-shilling pint, the bartender didn't give you coins—he gave you credit or a smaller IOU.

People signed the back of checks and passed them along like soggy banknotes. One check could have twenty signatures after traveling through pubs, butchers, and hardware stores.

The entire country played a giant game of "pass the parcel." Everyone agreed the paper was worth the face value, effectively creating a DIY currency out of thin air.

But didn't they eventually run out of room for all those signatures?

Not even close. When the back of the check became a solid wall of ink, they didn't stop. They simply taped a fresh scrap of paper to the bottom and kept the chain going.

These extensions, called "allonges," could turn a small slip of paper into a scrolling list as long as a grocery receipt. As long as the signatures were connected, the money stayed "real."

It was essentially a low-tech blockchain held together by Scotch tape. The physical length of the check became a map of the community’s collective trust.

Explore in card mode →

Related topics

The 1784 British Brick Tax and the resulting giant bricksThe 1920s Florida land boom and selling underwater swamplandThe 1696 English Window Tax and bricked-up windowsThe 17th-century 'Kipper und Wipper' coin debasement crisisThe 1720 South Sea Bubble 'mystery company' investmentThe 1997 Bre-X gold mining fraud