SoDeep IconSoDeep
·
The 1922 'King Tut' curse as a media circulation stunt

The 1922 'King Tut' curse as a media circulation stunt

@The_History_Heist · June 29, 2026

Everyone thinks the Pharaoh’s curse was some ancient mystical hex. It wasn't. It was a desperate marketing ploy by journalists who were pissed off they didn't have "exclusive" rights to the dig.

The Times of London had the only legal access to the tomb. Every other newspaper was starving for content. When Lord Carnarvon died from a random mosquito bite, rival papers saw their chance.

They didn't have facts, so they sold "spooky." They manufactured a viral sensation decades before the internet existed just to spite their competitors and sell more copies.

Wait, how did one newspaper manage to lock down an entire archaeological site?

It was a cold-blooded cash grab. Lord Carnarvon had spent a decade pouring his fortune into the sand. By the time they found the door, he was broke and desperate to recoup his investment.

He sold the exclusive rights to The Times for £5,000. This turned a global discovery into a private corporate asset. If you weren't on their payroll, you were barred from the site entirely.

That blackout forced rival reporters to get 'creative.' Since they couldn't get facts, they manufactured the 'curse' narrative as a way to hijack the story and sell papers without needing access.

What kind of 'creative' nonsense did they actually make up first?

It started with a fake inscription. A reporter named Arthur Weigall, who was fuming on the sidelines, claimed there was a warning carved above the door: "Death shall come on swift wings to him who disturbs the peace of the King."

The catch? That inscription didn't exist. There was no warning, no hex, nothing but dust and gold. But once that "quote" hit the wires, it was game over for the truth.

Then, when Lord Carnarvon’s dog allegedly howled and dropped dead in England at the exact moment he died in Cairo, the papers had their "proof." It was pure fan fiction dressed up as breaking news.

Did anyone actually check the timing, or did they just take their word?

Nobody checked because, in 1923, you physically couldn't. There were no international phone calls or synchronized digital clocks. By the time a letter or telegram arrived to confirm the dog's death, the 'curse' story was already front-page news globally.

The reporters knew that speed beats accuracy every time. They took a sad, unrelated event—a pet passing away—and simply nudged the clock to make it fit their narrative. It was the ultimate 'trust me, bro' moment of the decade.

The public was so hungry for a thrill that they didn't want to see the receipts. They wanted a ghost story, and the newspapers were happy to forge the evidence to give them one.

So the scientists just sat there while the media lied?

Howard Carter was livid. He was trying to do actual science while reporters outside invented ghost stories. He called the curse "tommyrot," but the public ignored him because the lie was more profitable than the truth.

Ironically, the chaos served a purpose. The "curse" became a cheap security system. It scared away amateur looters and annoying tourists who were terrified of catching a pharaoh's hex.

Carter eventually realized that if the world was scared of ghosts, they’d stay away from his gold. He let the media spin their tales because it gave him the peace he needed to finish the job.

Explore in card mode →

Related topics

The 1944 'Percentages Agreement' written on a scrap of paperThe 1922 'March on Rome' and Mussolini's sleeper car ticketThe stolen wristwatches in the 1945 Reichstag victory photoThe 1924 Zinoviev Letter's forensic evidenceThe 1918 "Spanish Flu" and the wartime military press censorship logsThe 1944 Bretton Woods conference's alcohol and steak receipts